Showing posts with label women's rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women's rights. Show all posts

Monday, March 22, 2010

COMMENTS FROM JILL CHAMBERS, charter member of Indiana National Organization of Women, now with the Indiana Family Support Services Agency.

Jill was a key member of the Indiana Women's Political Caucus and the Hoosiers for Equal Rights lobbying group. She was, among the many then-middle-aged women, the "youngster" and never failed for mentoring from ALL. She and others, are carrying on, if not the direct fight, the tradition of bringing women's history to the forefront in the 21st centur through the Indiana Women's History Association. Her comments, dated March 22, 2010, follow:

Subject: Re: "Why didn't the ERA pass?"

Primary reason: money.

Even Florida legislators who were elected because they said they would vote for ERA took insurance industry funds and voted no when it came up. Even though women went to the polls to defeat these turncoats, these guys ended up working for insurance companies. Charging women more for life and other insurance was pure profit for these companies and money did the ERA in.

In Illinois the Democratic party, unions were infighting- and yes money was behind that, too. Legislators who normally would have voted for ERA did not because of infighting.

Oklahoma- tons of money in a traditionally conservative state turned the trick. Much of it was insurance money. Considering that women made up less than 10 % of any legislative body at the time also had something to do with it.

Those three states could have given this country constitutional equality of rights for women- they failed. The campaigns for ERA were underfunded and less cohesive than they might have been, but it does not excuse the fact that the predominantly male dominated legislators killed the ERA. Yes, some women legislators voted against it, but they were a minority of women in all bodies. The majority of women legislators voted for it as well as the men in the 35 states. We needed 38 states.

The upside- most young women who did not go through the campaign- or care much about history at all, think it passed and act accordingly.

Friday, March 19, 2010

"Why didn't the ERA pass?" comments by Betty Packard Voris, self-employed lobbying dynamo

Packard-Voris was one of the women who registered with the Secretary of State to lobby for Hoosiers for the ERA (HERA). She was a Republican who, along with Mary Ann Butters and others, so acted. The primary registered democrat lobbyists were, as I recall, Molly Rucker and Virginia Dill McCarty, prominent Democrat who ran for governor, among other things. Here are Betty's comments, dated March 19, 2010:


Beth,

You are asked, "Why didn't it pass?" We have only to look at the health reform bill now in Congress; it is a reflection of what we were up against back then.

The opposition got a huge jump on us with some rather dramatic tactics led by Phyllis Schafley: It would destroy the family; We would be able to abort any or all children; It is not needed, we already have laws on the books; Men would not be able to support their families; We would raise homosexual children; Women are supposed to nurture children and protect the family; It is against God's law; etc etc etc Not unlike the death squads etc that have been floated to the sky in response to the proposed new health reform legislation. We played catch-up for 7 years with the opposition loud and vehement. The health reform legislation today has the backing and support of the president; that was not the case back then. We fought politics every day and the Republicans were in control of Congress and the presidency (Nixon and finally Ford who was not about to acquiesce to anything political at that point) and Republicans as a group were dead set against it.

We got it passed in Indiana because we lobbied for 7 long years and highlighted lots of Indiana laws (287 to be exact) which were discriminatory that got changed in the process. With the changing of those laws, we broke down some barriers that made the ERA seem less strident and made it easier for some Senators to vote for it - even if their constituents were not.

Does the Declaration have the vote? I would love to have a copy of the vote itself. I still remember Chip Edwards telling me that my blood would drip through the cracks of the State House before he would let the ERA pass.The day of the vote I went up to him and told him to skate in order to not be embarrassed. And he did skate. Would love to always have that plastered over my desk for a quiet chuckle now and then.

Comments from Nancy Papas, lobbyist for Indiana State Teachers' Association.

Ed. note:Nancy Papas was a najor player in supporting the Equal Rights Amendment. An assistant to Senator Birch Bayh at the time of the ERA passage through Congress, she and ISTA and a few other "veterans" gave substance, respectability, and great advice and action to the novice ERA supporters. Here is her statement, dated March 19, 2010, in response to the question "Why didn't the ERA pass?"

"ERA was the victim of massive disinformation which scared off conservatives in both parties. The ERA had strong bi-partisan support in Congress. If Strom Thurmond could support the ERA, why not other conservatives?

Phyllis Schlafly built her nation-wide network of conservative women by raising false alarms about what it would do. Equal rights for women and men would not force everyone to use the same restroom, though most of us do that at home and on airplanes – just not at the same time – and we have survived very nicely.

ERA opponents charged that it would encourage women to have abortions, though no one could ever explain how. Virginia McCarty asked if that meant men would be able to have abortions too?

Fear clouds intelligent thought, and fear was the weapon of choice against ERA.

Fortunately, the successful efforts to pass legislation like Title IX and the civil and voting rights acts made America much more aware of discrimination of various sorts. Title IX alone has exploded educational opportunities for women students and made them much more able to compete in the market place.

When I first lobbied for ERA in the halls of the state legislature, a handful of women reporters and lobbyists were there and another handful of women legislators. Now it appears nearly half the lobbyists are women, and the voters have elected 32 women legislators and a female Lt. Governor. Both political parties actively recruit women candidates. Governors and Mayors appoint women department heads. Network and Cable News has women anchors. Television dramas feature women in occupations formerly reserved for men. Today’s little girls want to grow up to be CEO’s and company presidents rather than Cinderella.

We may have lost the ERA battle, but women are making real progress to win the war.

We had the help of many progressive women and men who celebrated, promoted, and were not fearful of legal equality of women.
In addition to you Beth, there was Virginia McCarty, Betty Blumberg, Mandy Wertz and Betty Williams, Jane Fribley, Jill Chambers, Sue Errington (who’s now in the State Senate), Laurie Scholl (and many others) plus ERA’s author - Birch Bayh – and state legislators Kermit Burrous, Tom Teague, Bob Fair, Phil Bainbridge, Cliff Arnold, Tom Fruechtenicht, Bob Hayes, and others.

The battle to help women and families gain their due continues to be sure, but extraordinary women throughout history found ways to survive, to raise their families, and to contribute to their neighbors and communities despite incredible obstacles. Fortunately, we were able to stand on the shoulders of them all.